Underground Stories 05-29-14

Kingdom of Hawaii challenges US over sovereignty

The CEO of the Hawaiian Affairs Office (OHA) has retained his job and gained public support to challenge the US on whether the Kingdom of Hawaii still exists as a sovereign country.

Kamanaopono Crabbe sparked an internal crisis when he sent a letter to US Secretary of State John Kerry, asking for a ruling on whether the Kingdom of Hawaii still legally exists.
The letter, which was quickly rescinded by the OHA’s trustees, was prompted by the US Government’s acknowledgment that the overthrow of the kingdom in 1893 was illegal.
Political scientist Dr Keanu Sai, from Windward Communtiy College in Honolulu, told Pacific Beat the OHA board thought Dr Crabbe had violated their policy by sending the letter without approval, but later realised they were mistaken.
“[Dr Crabbe] was not in violation of any policy of the board but rather was operating on his diligence and risk management,” Dr Sai said.
Mr Crabbe has now won the support of the OHA trustees, who have moved to send the letter again and retain him in his role as CEO.
“They’re in full support and they say that his questions definitely do have merit.”
Public support for Mr Crabbe’s campaign is also growing, with 2,500 people signing an online petition.
Dr Sai said Hawaiians need clarification on the issue.
“What was overthrown was the government, not the country,” he said.
Dr Sai blames revisionist history education for misconstruing local understanding of Hawaii’s true status.
“A revisionist history has been taught here in Hawaii since the early 1900s that presented Hawaii as if it was a part of the United States when in fact there is clear evidence that it’s not,” he said.
“We need to address this because it will affect our people but it also affects everyone.”
Dr Sai says if the Kingdom of Hawaii does indeed still exist, many historical treaties with nations including the UK and Australia would still be in effect.

Bilderberg 2014 Meeting This Weekend

Video Revealing Obama’s Background Goes Viral!

Here is a comprehensive history of Barack Hussein Obama’s background. This is an older video, but still, none of these questions have been answered. Its gone viral this week on Facebook, and there’s a reason why. People still want to know the answers.
-

Dems Meeting This Week To Formulate Plan To Deal With Hillary Clinton’s Involvement In Benghazi Scandal

A broad array of Democrats — including Hillary Clinton’s allies — are meeting this week to hammer out a united front on national security issues, including a clear response to Republicans over the Benghazi controversy.
They see an opportunity to wrest control of a narrative that some allies fear could be damaging to Clinton if she moves ahead with a 2016 presidential campaign.
A major milestone in the effort will take place this Friday, when a coalition of Democratic-leaning groups and influentials converges at the headquarters of the centrist think-tank Third Way for a briefing that includes top Clinton adviser Philippe Reines.
The meeting is one in a series that Third Way has convened with Democrats since the George W. Bush era to discuss and shape national security policy. But at least some Democrats involved in the upcoming session are hoping it results in a coordinated and strengthened response to the new congressional probe into the deadly Benghazi attack.
Several people involved in the meeting say Reines was invited to speak at Third Way on Friday to discuss the chapter of Clinton’s upcoming book “Hard Choices” that covers the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks on U.S. diplomatic outposts in Benghazi that left four Americans dead — including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Reines is one of a handful of guests who are expected to speak on a number of topics. Other anticipated areas of discussion include President Barack Obama’s Wednesday speech about foreign policy.
-

Blood On Hillary Clinton’s Hands For What She Did As Secretary Of State

When the Nigerian terrorist group Boko Haram bombed a Catholic church on Christmas Day 2011, killing dozens of Christians, no one heard a peep from then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. Or when the same group burned alive dozens of boys at a boarding school in February of this year, again, Hillary Clinton was silent. Only when over two hundred girls were kidnapped by Boko Haram and Hillary Clinton could use it to prop up her 2016 presidential bid—commandeering the #BringOurGirlsBack hashtag on Twitter—did Clinton speak up. Hillary Clinton, however, should have kept her mouth shut.

This revealed that in 2011, after Boko Haram had been on a killing spree for over two years, Hillary Clinton refused to designate Boko Haram as a terrorist group. This was no mere indecision: The Department of Justice, FBI, and CIA had formally requested that Boko Haram be designated a terrorist group in 2011. When Clinton openly refused, in 2012, the Congressional Committees on Homeland Security and Counterterrorism and Intelligence requested that:
You…immediately designate the Nigerian Islamist group Boko Haram a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO), in accordance with Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended, and designate Boko Haram as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist entity (SDGT)…
And Boko Haram wasn’t just a threat to Nigeria, as cited by the congressional request, but was a threat to the United States. The November 2011 congressional report “Boko Haram: Emerging Threat to the U.S. Homeland” spelled out in plain language that Boko Haram was working in tandem with al-Qaeda and posed an imminent threat to the United States.
Still, Hillary Clinton refused to act. The result was the bombing of a Catholic church in Nigeria a month later, in which forty-two Christians were massacred.
VERY GRAPHIC VIDEO HERE

Inside the Ring: Memo outlines Obama’s plan to use the military against citizens

A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans.
The directive contains noncontroversial provisions on support to civilian fire and emergency services, special events and the domestic use of the Army Corps of Engineers.

The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest.
“This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.
Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities,” was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S. commanders “are provided emergency authority under this directive.”
“Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority,” the directive states.
“In these circumstances, those federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the president is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances” under two conditions.
The conditions include military support needed “to prevent significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property and are necessary to restore governmental function and public order.” A second use is when federal, state and local authorities “are unable or decline to provide adequate protection for federal property or federal governmental functions.”
“Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions,” the directive states.
Military assistance can include loans of arms, ammunition, vessels and aircraft. The directive states clearly that it is for engaging civilians during times of unrest.
A U.S. official said the Obama administration considered but rejected deploying military force under the directive during the recent standoff with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and his armed supporters.

Just When You Thought Michelle Obama Couldn’t Be Anymore Hypocritical, This Information Is Exposed

First Lady Michelle Obama has been campaigning for “healthy” school lunches since she launched “Let’s Move!” in 2010, but the school lunches her own daughters dine on are nothing like the ones she’s forced on America’s public school children.
Public schools are now forced to serve tiny-portioned “vegetable-packed” lunches that children have deemed “disgusting” and inedible. But what are the Obama children served at school?
Sasha and Malia Obama attend the Sidwell Friends School, which was voted the #1 School Lunch program in the country. Their lunches are prepared by chefs and include dishes like chicken coconut soup crusted tilapia. But they’re also served meals including meatball subs, barbecue wings and ice cream—foods all deemed “unhealthy” by Michelle Obama’s standards.
It’s almost like Mrs. Obama is a hypocrite. Who would have thought?
-

Revealed: Find Out Who Actually Runs The Media… 

One of the major speakers at last week’s “New Populism” conference was Larry Cohen, president of the Communications Workers of America (CWA), a labor union that represents online writers, reporters, editorial assistants, editorial artists, and correspondents at major news organizations.
Cohen gave his speech after returning from the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) conference, where Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon, was announced as winner of the title of “the world’s worst boss” for trying to keep prices low for consumers and opposing union control of his workplace.

Bezos, the new owner of The Washington Post, will have to negotiate with The Newspaper Guild, which merged with the CWA in 1995 and represents nearly 900 editorial and newsroom workers at the Post.
“Amazon has successfully fended off U.S. labor unions since its founding in 1994,” notes Time magazine.
Bezos has been described as a libertarian; but the Post was known as a liberal Democrat newspaper under its previous owners, the Grahams.
It will be interesting to see if he cuts this union down to size. The survival of the paper, with declining revenue and readers, may depend on it.
As the “populism” conference indicates, the progressives—once called liberals—are now calling themselves something else, in order to fool the electorate.
Don’t look for the media to blow the whistle on themselves.
Whatever they call themselves, they are in control of much of the news and editorial content of major news media organizations.
We look forward to the Post, under its new owner, telling the truth about how the CWA functions as a major component of the progressive movement, and how liberal bias is killing the appeal of the so-called mainstream media.

Obama’s West Point Speech signals a presidency in deep trouble

Anyone who is paying attention knows that the Obama Presidency is in trouble. Even those vehemently opposed to President Obama and his Administration can still recognize how dangerous it is for the United States and all of us when we have a president as inept, tone deaf, and weak as this one. We were still in a recovery phase internationally from the Carter Administration before Obama took office. How long will it take to recover from the rudderless and limp Obama Foreign Policy?
From AmericanThinker.com:

Yesterday’s speech to the graduatingclass of West Point by President Obama may be remembered as the signal that his presidency has entered a crisis of confidence, much as Jimmy Carter’s infamous “malaise” speech has gone down in history  as marking a failed presidency.  Not only was the content of the speech delusional (calling Russia “isolated” in the wake of a massive and historic gas deal with China that marks a major rapprochement between two powers hostile to the United States; claiming Ukraine as an example of the success of his coalition strategy), the delivery was wooden, as if Obama were wishing he were on a golf course or basketball court, and felt a hostile vibe. And the visible reception was embarrassingly icy, with only a few people applauding at key lines, and a standing ovation in which the vast majority remained seated and unmoved, suggesting the commander in chief is held in contempt by the next generation of military leadership.

Donald Trump Releases Startling New Facts About Obama’s Citizenship

Donald Trump has long been suspicious regarding the citizenship status of Obama and the adamant reluctance for the current administration to release his college documents. Speaking at the National Press Club on Tuesday, Trump made the shocking admission that there was a, “very big chance,” Obama was born in America.
The confession isn’t given lightly however as Trump explains Obama’s denial of a $50 million dollar deal to view the seemingly classified documents. The real estate mogul explains that he offered Obama $5 million to just take a peek at the records, to which he didn’t get a reply.
Upping the ante, he eventually offered a staggering $50 million – to be given to any charity Obama saw fit – just to see the documents, and even insisted he could have cared less about the grades. Yet again though, Trump never received a reply giving him absolute confidence that Obama was hiding something.
After such a distinction was made, Trump was able to draw his own conclusions sure that the reality of that matter could only be one of three things. The documents were fine and that Obama was born in America and went to college as an American – an option he views as the most unlikely of the three.
He could have, in fact, been born in Kenya making his eligibility to be president null and void. Or lastly – and this is what Trump explains he’s grown prone to believe – Obama was born in America, but pretended to have been born in Kenya to receive the aid given to foreign nationals.
Either way, even if it turned out to be the third option, Obama would have been complicit in a felony, which also would have disqualified him from being the President of the United States. No wonder he’s keeping this one so close to his chest.
(See also: Obama’s Labor Secretary Went Total Communist On Memorial Day)
I think we can all agree, that when you pass down $50 million – it only goes to prove that you have your holding something back. Heck, don’t believe us? You remember what Obama had to say, “The only people that don’t want to disclose the truth, are people with something to hide.”